Dispositions Other Than By Published Opinion | Sept. 30, 2026
Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals
Division I
Division II
123,893 – The Simmons Charitable Foundation of Oklahoma, Paul A.A. Cox, an individual and Paul Anthony Andres Cox and Melinda Cox as Co-Trustees of The Paul Anthony Andres Cox Trust B, created pursuant to the Trust Agreement dated December 14, 1976, creating The Mixson Simmons Gray Trust B, and The Paul Anthony Andres Cox Trust D, created pursuant to the Trust Agreement dated December 14, 1976, creating The Mixson Simmons Gray Trust D, Plaintiffs/ Appellants, vs. Holly Antoinette Andres Cox Healey, individually and as Trustee for The Mixson Simmons Gray Trust B, under Trust B for the benefit of Holly C. Healey and The Mixson Simmons Gray Trust D for the benefit of Holly C. Healey, Clayton B. Healey; AIC Title Agency, LLC, Principal Aviation Group, LLC, Avsure, Inc., AVS Holding, Inc., Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Defendants/Appellees. Appeal from the District Court of Oklahoma County, Hon. Anthony L. Bonner, Jr., Trial Judge. Plaintiffs appeal an Order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants Holly Antoinette Andrews Cox Healey (Healey), individually and as Trustee for The Mixson Simmons Gray Trust B, under Trust B for the Benefit of Holly C. Healey and the Mixson Simmons Gray Trust D for the Benefit of Holly C. Healey; Clayton B. Healey (Clayton); AIC Title Agency, L.L.C. (AIC); Principal Aviation Group, LLC (PAG); Avsure, Inc., AVS Holding, Inc.; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. (Mintz Levin); and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Defendants) on the basis of the run of statute of limitations applicable to Plaintiffs’ various tort claims against the Defendants arising from alleged self-dealing or misappropriation of funds from SCF certain family trusts. On review of the record on appeal and applicable law, we find the undisputed facts demonstrate the entirety of Plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the statute of limitations and affirm the trial court’s journal entry “sustaining” Defendants’ joint motion for summary judgment of February 20, 2026, modified to enter judgment to Defendants on Plaintiffs’ claims in their entirety. AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED. Opinion from Court of Civil Appeals, Division II, by HIXON, C.J.; WISEMAN, P.J., and FISCHER, J., concur. Sept. 24, 2026
123,528 – In the Matter of S.S.C., Alleged Deprived Child, McCrea Courtney, Appellant vs. State of Oklahoma, Appellee. Proceeding to review an Order of the District Court of Washita County, Hon. Stephanie Jones, Trial Judge. McCrea Courtney (Mother) appeals the Order Terminating Parental Rights following a jury’s verdict terminating her parental rights to her minor child, S.S.C. Specifically, Mother proposes that the court’s pretrial decision to suspend her visitation with S.S.C. was an abuse of discretion which denied her a fair trial. Further, Mother proposes on appeal that her due process rights were violated when State added grounds for termination post-adjudication; and that the trial court’s allowance of evidence at trial regarding prior criminal history and child welfare history constituted fundamental error. Based on our review of the record and applicable law, we affirm the order. AFFIRMED. Substitute Opinion from the Court of Civil Appeals, Division II, by HIXON, C.J.; WISEMAN, P.J., and FISCHER, J., concur. Sept. 24, 2026
123,315 – American Structural Metals, Inc., a Wisconsin Corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant, vs. GHMR Operations, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company, and AGTEXAS, FLCA, Defendants/Appellees, Sandview, LTD f/k/a Vista Sand, a Texas limited partnership; Vista Proppants and Logistics, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company; Oklahoma Energy Acquisitions, LP, a Texas limited partnership; Oklahoma Produced Water Solutions L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; Engineered Software Products, Inc., a Georgia corporation; Board of County Commissioners of Blaine County, Oklahoma; and County Treasurer of Blaine County, Oklahoma; John Doe, Inc.; John Doe, LLC; John Doe, LP; John Doe entities, Additional Defendants, MP Systems Company, a Kansas corporation, Additional Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Gary Humphries and Marty Robertson, Third-Party Defendants. Proceeding to review an Order of the District Court of Blaine County, Hon. Allison M. Lafferty, Trial Judge. American Structural Metals, Inc. appeals the district court’s order granting the motions to dismiss filed by defendants GHMR Operations, L.L.C. and AGTEXAS, FLCA. Because the dismissal order did not dispose of all pending claims and parties in the case and did not contain a proper certification pursuant to 12 O.S.2021 § 994, it was not an appealable order. Accordingly, this Court lacks jurisdiction to resolve this appeal, and it is dismissed as premature. APPEAL DISMISSED. Opinion from the Court of Civil Appeals, Division II by FISCHER, J.; HIXON, C.J., and WISEMAN, P.J., concur. Sept. 28, 2026
123,118 – Tar Creek, LLC, Plaintiff/Appellee, vs. Jerica Ann Burton, Defendant/Appellant. Appeal from the District Court of Carter County, Hon. Ryan G. Hunnicutt, Trial Judge. Jerica Ann Burton, pro se, appeals the district court’s judgment in this forcible entry and detainer action in favor of Tar Creek, LLC. Jerica Burton’s propositions of error fail to show district court error for multiple reasons, including the failure to provide a record sufficient to demonstrate error. The district court’s judgment is affirmed. AFFIRMED. Opinion from Court of Civil Appeals, Division II, by FISCHER, J.; WISEMAN, P.J., and HIXON, C.J., concur. Sept. 29, 2026
Division III
121,873 – In Re the Marriage of: Charlton Edward Parker, Petitioner/Appellee, v. Mondi Gail Parker, Respondent/Appellant. Appeal from the District Court of Custer County, Oklahoma. Honorable Michelle Kirby Roper, Trial Judge. Appellant, Mondi Parker (Wife), appeals from the Corrected Journal Entry and Decree of Dissolution of Marriage for Remaining Issues (2025 Corrected Decree) filed on February 3, 2025. Wife primarily contests the trial court’s valuation and distribution of the marital estate. Based on our review of the record and applicable law, we AFFIRM AND REMAND WITH INSTRUCTION. Opinion by DOWNING, P.J.; PRINCE, V.C.J., and MITCHELL, J., CONCUR. Sept. 24, 2026
123,487 – In Re the Marriage of: Steven Goss, Petitioner/Appellee, and Terrie Goss, Respondent/Appellee, and Todd Bowles and Misty Bowles, Intervenors/Appellants. Todd Bowles and Misty Bowles, Plaintiffs/Appellants, and Steven M. Goss, Terrie R. Goss, and the Terrie Rae Goss Revocable Trust Dated February 4, 2000, Defendants/Appellees. Todd Bowles and Misty Bowles, Plaintiffs/Appellants, and Kay D. Goss, Steven Goss, et al., Defendants/Appellees. Appeal from the District Court of Seminole County, Oklahoma. Honorable Brett Butner, Trial Judge. Todd and Misty Bowles (Plaintiffs/Appellants) appeal the trial court’s Order in the Bowles’ fraudulent transfer action against Steven Goss, Terrie Goss, and the Terrie Rae Goss Revocable Trust (Defendants/Appellees). The Bowles, as judgment creditors, initiated the fraudulent transfer action to set aside transfers of non-exempt assets made by Steven Goss to Terrie Goss and her Revocable Trust (“the Terrie Goss Trust”). The Bowles appeal only a portion of the trial court’s Order, specifically alleging the trial court erroneously held the Bowles had not met their burden of proving two of Steven Goss’ transfers were fraudulent to the Bowles as judgment creditors: (1) the transfer of $749,903.69 from the Gosses’ joint checking account into the construction of a lake house titled solely in the Terrie Goss Trust; and (2) the withdrawal of $450,000 (later refinanced to $525,000.00) from a line-of-credit loan deposited into the Gosses’ joint checking account and subsequent transfer into the construction of the lake house titled solely in the Terrie Goss Trust. We find the record supports the trial court’s conclusion that the Bowles did not meet their burden of demonstrating Mr. Goss’ movement of the funds used to construct the lake house constituted a transfer fraudulent to the Bowles as judgment creditors. We, accordingly, AFFIRM. Opinion by PRINCE, V.C.J.; DOWNING, P.J., and MITCHELL, J., CONCUR. Sept. 24, 2026
123,967 – In Re the Marriage of: Steven Goss, Petitioner, and Terrie Goss, Respondent, and Todd Bowles and Misty Bowles, Intervenors/Appellants, and Charles M. Laster, Appellee. Todd Bowles and Misty Bowles, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Steven M. Goss, Terri R. Goss, and the Terrie Rae Goss, Revocable Trust Dated February 4, 2000, Defendants, and Charles M. Laster, Appellee. Appeal from the District Court of Seminole County, Oklahoma. Honorable Brett Butner, Trial Judge. Todd and Misty Bowles (Appellants) appeal the trial court’s determination that a portion of the proceeds from the Receiver’s sale of Steven Goss’ assets in a consolidated divorce and fraudulent-transfer proceeding were subject to Charles Laster’s (Appellee) attorney’s lien. Mr. Laster represented Mr. Goss, a judgment debtor of the Bowles, during Mr. Goss’ divorce proceedings with Terrie Goss and in the Bowles’ fraudulent transfer action,which were consolidated by the trial court. Following the adjudication of both the Gosses’ divorce and the Bowles’ fraudulent transfer claim, the trial court appointed a Receiver to sell certain property belonging to the Gosses. Mr. Laster sought to enforce his attorney’s lien against a portion of the proceeds acquired from the Receiver sale of Mr. Goss’ post-divorce assets. The trial court, ultimately, granted Mr. Laster’s Motion to Enforce Attorney’s Lien in part, but highlighted that Mr. Laster’s lien attached only to Mr. Goss’ post-Decree separate property and not to the Gosses’ property which had been fraudulently transferred, which the trial court awarded the Bowles. Based upon our review, we find no error in the trial court’s holding, and the matter is AFFIRMED AND REMANDED for the trial court to effectuate its earlier Judgment authorizing distribution of funds to the Bowles and Mr. Laster. Opinion by PRINCE, V.C.J.; DOWNING, P.J., and MITCHELL, J., CONCUR. Sept. 24, 2026
Division IV